Remember this W magazine cover that featured Demi Moore looking heavily photoshopped? The actress claimed it was her real bod, but photographer Citrano claimed the pic had actually been altered with to make her hips and thighs appear smaller.

Demi now requests that Citrano retracts his statement and apologizes, but he refuses. He goes so far as to direct people to a Korean version of the mag, which shows her with a curvier figure.

Citrano says:

Right when you thought (hoped) this whole thing was over, something comes along that, as the Jerky Boys would say, puts a whole different paint job on things. I was back in Maine for Christmas (and of course, holding my breath for an apology and retraction from Demi Moore and her legal team), just hanging out with my Mom and her cat – and in came a cameraphone tip from halfway ‘round the world… The January 2010 issue of W Korea just hit the newsstands (with the ironic subtitle Women in Full). Unsurprisingly, they decided to use the excellent Mert & Marcus shot of Demi Moore. But very surprisingly, they installed a new hip on Demi. So: even W’s sister publication thought the image looked weird enough to fix. This raises a few serious questions for (Moore’s lawyer) Martin Singer, his client, and W: did W’s Korean team add in a fake hip because they just kinda thought it looked awkward? (Y’know, like I did, before you attacked, discredited, and threatened to sue me?) Or did they merely reveal a hip that was already there, but that Singer, et alia litigiously denied had been accidentally obliterated? If it’s the former: are Singer, Moore et alia now going to pursue legal action against W Korea?

He calls this the “dumbest argument ever”, which I have to agree with. This isn’t going away any time soon. It seems like the shot was definitely photoshopped. Isn’t everything these days? That’s why they need to start putting a disclaimer on things! Why does Demi care so much to defend it? She still has a bangin’ bod if you ask me.